moral values
prostitution is legalized in one country where as it is considered amoral and illegal in another country. as 10 yrs ago, kiss in public places was socially forbidden but today it is ok without any moral concern. same about pre-marriage sex. If the boundaries of morality is getting pushed day by day then what restricts us to embrace those things today like same sex relationship what we will accept after 20 yrs down the line ? what kinds of cultural, moral and social developments will take place which redefine the subject in different light ? things are justified purely based on personal freedom and liking. the human values, relationship and way of thinking are function of time and space. so the outcome of any human action would be wrong or right is true only for particular frame of time and space. how does GOD punish a person who did something when it was considered amoral but died after 30-40 yrs when it is socially accepted? similarly someone who is involved in legalized prostitution in Thailand but stays in India . so with change of time or space or both , so-called amoral actions become justified.
if you defeat law then you are a great guy.
we use terrorism in context of humane genocide by certain highly motivated groups for their own selfish motives which are against national interests. Take one example of Nepal maoist leader Mr. Prachanda. he masterminded several mass killings. he was declared state-terrorist by Nepal king. he would be shot down or possibly hanged to death if he ever caught. but with rise of power and popularity of Mr. Prachanda and at the same time decline in power of King, he would become prime minister of democratic Nepal in forth coming election. then his all past actions would be perceived worldwide as freedom fightings. Let see if LTTE cheif Prabhakaran dies as terrorist or as father of nation. have a look at Indian and Pakistani political industries. most powerful and legally respected men are legally not-proved tainted accused. highly appreciated villain characters in hollywood flicks are never nabbed by police. watch Basic Instinct, Sword fish, wild things and even hindi movie Dhoom-2.
rich men die in good shape.
it's common philosophy, if you do something bad then you have to suffer in your life for your bad actions. does it really hold ? i have seen many people dying miserably due to lack of wealth. it doesn't matters whether he did something great or bad. in most cases, what matters...does he/she have enough money to die comfortably? What is fault of people who are born in poor African nations or Afghanistan who are killed by local militants anytime for their no fault ? if GOD saves innocent people then when there is tsunami or volcano eruption or bomb blast then only bad persons should have died. does it happen even one out of a million cases ?
prostitution is legalized in one country where as it is considered amoral and illegal in another country. as 10 yrs ago, kiss in public places was socially forbidden but today it is ok without any moral concern. same about pre-marriage sex. If the boundaries of morality is getting pushed day by day then what restricts us to embrace those things today like same sex relationship what we will accept after 20 yrs down the line ? what kinds of cultural, moral and social developments will take place which redefine the subject in different light ? things are justified purely based on personal freedom and liking. the human values, relationship and way of thinking are function of time and space. so the outcome of any human action would be wrong or right is true only for particular frame of time and space. how does GOD punish a person who did something when it was considered amoral but died after 30-40 yrs when it is socially accepted? similarly someone who is involved in legalized prostitution in Thailand but stays in India . so with change of time or space or both , so-called amoral actions become justified.
if you defeat law then you are a great guy.
we use terrorism in context of humane genocide by certain highly motivated groups for their own selfish motives which are against national interests. Take one example of Nepal maoist leader Mr. Prachanda. he masterminded several mass killings. he was declared state-terrorist by Nepal king. he would be shot down or possibly hanged to death if he ever caught. but with rise of power and popularity of Mr. Prachanda and at the same time decline in power of King, he would become prime minister of democratic Nepal in forth coming election. then his all past actions would be perceived worldwide as freedom fightings. Let see if LTTE cheif Prabhakaran dies as terrorist or as father of nation. have a look at Indian and Pakistani political industries. most powerful and legally respected men are legally not-proved tainted accused. highly appreciated villain characters in hollywood flicks are never nabbed by police. watch Basic Instinct, Sword fish, wild things and even hindi movie Dhoom-2.
rich men die in good shape.
it's common philosophy, if you do something bad then you have to suffer in your life for your bad actions. does it really hold ? i have seen many people dying miserably due to lack of wealth. it doesn't matters whether he did something great or bad. in most cases, what matters...does he/she have enough money to die comfortably? What is fault of people who are born in poor African nations or Afghanistan who are killed by local militants anytime for their no fault ? if GOD saves innocent people then when there is tsunami or volcano eruption or bomb blast then only bad persons should have died. does it happen even one out of a million cases ?
2 comments:
its gud to knw dat u thnk....quite a lot...n u hav content....bt u r very confused..n thre r certn issues wch u tried to reveal in dis topic...wch r sensitive bt u urslf r nt sure of these...
snce m critical by nature....hehehhe...i wud suggest u to wrk on ur english...
othrwise..u hav content...u ryt well...u thnk well...its gud to knw such ppl...
Ritesh
You have written a good topic and you are thinking in right direction.
But there are various flaws in it.
firstly you tried to mingle various topics like terrorism, prostitution, politics and even religious also.
They are itself a topic and lots can be said about them. but you are discussing them simultaneously.
Secondly u can discuss them deeply. there are pros and cons of every side. Its True.
You have correctly said that something is illegal in one country and same thing is legal in other country. but this has nothing to do with God. its depend upon the culture and the government of the country.
You are a good writer but try to be focus iin your writing
Post a Comment